Whose Ground Truth? Human-Centered AI Must Embrace Interpretive Ambiguity
Position paper urges AI to model the full space of human interpretations rather than forcing a single ground truth.
This arXiv position paper challenges the foundational assumption in AI development that every input has one correct ground truth. It distinguishes genuine annotation noise from 'meaningful ambiguity' — cases where multiple interpretations are simultaneously valid — which is pervasive in human-centered tasks like sentiment analysis and content moderation. The authors call for shifting from fitting a single target to modeling an 'interpretation space,' arguing this perspective should span representation, learning, evaluation, deployment, and governance. Defaulting to one group's judgment as correct while discarding others is a latent bias amplification mechanism; embracing interpretive diversity is both a technical refinement and an ethical stance.
When "The One Right Answer" No Longer Holds
Almost every traditional machine learning and AI system is built on a default assumption: each input has one correct "ground truth." When multiple annotators disagree, engineering practice typically handles this in one of two ways — either compressing disagreements into a single label through voting, averaging, or other aggregation methods, or simply discarding the disagreement as "noise."
A position paper published on arXiv directly challenges this deeply ingrained assumption. The researchers argue that as AI systems increasingly interact with people and make judgments about them, understanding human "interpretation" itself has become an unavoidable core concern in developing Human-Centered AI (HCAI).
Ambiguity Is Not Noise — It's Information
The paper's central argument hinges on distinguishing two types of
Related articles
Uber Deploys ChatGPT Work Company-Wide: AI in the Workplace Enters the Scaled Implementation Phase
Uber deploys ChatGPT Work to 30,000+ employees, extending it from engineering to all roles. We analyze its expert-engineer pairing, end-to-end automation, and questions of AI control and power concentration—insights for scaling AI in the workplace.
Shift at Midnight Hands-On: When "ID Verification" Becomes Alien Hunting
Shift at Midnight blends ID verification with horror survival in a four-player co-op game. We break down its inspection mechanics and chaotic humor.
Zelensky Recounts the Outbreak of War: I Need Ammunition, Not a Ride
Zelensky recalls the first day of war in a YouTube interview: farewell to family, rejecting Biden's evacuation offer with "I need ammunition, not a ride," and how Bucha shaped his stance on compromise and peace talks.