Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the LibriSpeech test-clean/test-other datasets, Oído's on-device computation achieves a word error rate of 3.70% / 8.23%, differing from the full-precision version by only 0.12 percentage points.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn manually proofread samples, the character error rate was only 0.68% when the text was clearly legible, but approximately 45% of sampled passages were completely uncorrectable due to source quality issues.74% similarUnverifiedOn the same chip, Oído's error rate is 2.3 to 2.8 times lower than the chip vendor's built-in recognizer.70% similarUnverifiedThe accuracy data in the test has an error margin of approximately ±8–10 percentage points at n=100 sample size (based on a 95% confidence-level binomial confidence interval).69% similarUnverifiedTraining with the same recipe using only license-clean articles resulted in an accuracy drop of 0.0123 (95% interval 0.0034 to 0.0207).69% similarUnverifiedAn accuracy rate of 86% means there is still a 14% margin of error, making Articos more suitable as an early validation and directional judgment tool rather than a replacement for real user testing.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1001250API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1001250MCP
get_claim(id=1001250)