Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Compared to the average of the two graphs, the conditioned response graph reduces mean squared prediction error by 53.6% on Gemma-2-9B.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCompared to the historical mean baseline, entry-level and turn-level predictions reduced mean absolute error (MAE) by 4.03% and 3.92%, respectively.73% similarUnverifiedThe endpoint metric used in the evaluation is the difference of 'model minus uniform control group', where a positive value represents performing worse than the control.73% similarUnverifiedIn recommendation scenarios, models typically use Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) to measure the error between predicted ratings and actual ratings.72% similarUnverifiedExperimental results show that under model misspecification conditions, PrO-GPs produce better calibrated predictive distributions than standard GP methods.71% similarUnverifiedZillow 的 Zestimate 自动估值模型误差率中位数在2-7%之间71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1001924API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1001924MCP
get_claim(id=1001924)