Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
This study exposes a class of systematic failures that are completely invisible to output-based evaluation
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf a model possesses deceptive capabilities, traditional misalignment detection and evaluation methods may fail entirely.72% similarUnverifiedReplay-based validation can detect 76.2% of unsuccessful improvements, whereas build-check-only approaches fail to detect any of these behavioral failures.70% similarUnverifiedScoring with completion-style proxy metrics will classify failures that terminate cleanly but produce incorrect results as successes, which is a flaw in many current agent evaluations.69% similarUnverifiedIn scenarios with extreme class imbalance (such as fraud detection), looking solely at accuracy as an evaluation metric is completely meaningless.68% similarUnverifiedNearly all mainstream large language models make misjudgments on the second report in Skepticism Audit, and distinguishing real threats from false positives is a common weakness of current models.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1002030API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1002030MCP
get_claim(id=1002030)