Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
After restoring flushing, the Claude candidate achieved a completion speedup of 2.75× and a time-to-first-byte speedup of 2.80×, while Gemini achieved a completion speedup of 3.44× and a time-to-first-byte speedup of 3.54×, and GPT-5.4 achieved a completion speedup of 2.16× and a time-to-first-byte speedup of 2.19×.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAcross nine revised runs, the median completion speedup was 5.35× for Gemini, 3.69× for Claude, and 1.00× for GPT-5.4, with all three passing automated checks.78% similarUnverifiedClaude's original candidate removed per-token fflush(stdout) in favor of flushing only at the end; replay measured a completion speedup of 2.73× but a time-to-first-byte speedup of only 0.44× (i.e., streaming output became slower).75% similarUnverifiedIn Strata's speed table, under a 128k context, Q2_0 (2-bit) achieves 65.1 tokens/s and IQ2_XS achieves 52 tokens/s; under a 4k short context, IQ3_XXS achieves 65.6 tokens/s.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1002743API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1002743MCP
get_claim(id=1002743)