Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The Bonsai 2 27B non-thinking configuration achieves 12/16, and the Medium thinking configuration achieves 15/16 (both substantive and strict), which is the most impressive result.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLlama 3.1 8B and Qwen2.5 14B are recommended for general reasoning and Q&A, with the latter performing better on Chinese and complex reasoning.60% similarVerifiedQwen3.8-27B delivers impressive performance in specific scenarios such as front-end display, and may be one of the best-performing locally deployed large models currently available, showing a significant capability improvement over the Meta 30B model and Qwen3.6-27B.60% similarVerifiedQwen3.8-27B enables Thinking mode by default, with reasoning depth available in three levels: Low, Medium, and X-High.59% similarUnverifiedMuse-Glimmer-30B在智能体工作流得90.87分、指令遵循90.86分、工具/CLI 88.84分，三项均优于Corpus 3.6 27B59% similarUnverifiedGlimmer's intelligence index score of 35 surpasses Gemma 2 27B (30) and nearly matches Qwen 2.5 (36), with Qwen 2.5 72B topping the leaderboard at 38.57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1003731API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1003731MCP
get_claim(id=1003731)