Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Truncated natural language prose output has no signals such as grammatical errors or parsing failures, making truncation difficult to detect.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWriting scoring rules into a prompt in natural language has drawbacks: wording variations across different calls may cause the model's understanding to drift, and the scoring logic cannot be directly parsed or reused by programs.71% similarUnverifiedThe output of large language models inherently appears plausible (fluency bias), meaning that even when the reasoning chain is wrong, the generated natural language remains grammatically correct and natural in tone, rendering traditional monitoring approaches based on output format or exception capture ineffective.69% similarUnverified许多编程语言失败并非因为技术缺陷，而是因为不够有趣（缺乏开发者的愉悦体验）68% similarUnverifiedTest scenarios involving ambiguous natural-language time expressions must be run multiple times, because a single clean result proves almost nothing.67% similarVerifiedText generated by large language models tends to have low perplexity, with word choices that are overly consistent with probabilistic expectations, lacking the unexpectedness of human writing.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1003919API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1003919MCP
get_claim(id=1003919)