Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Over the past six months, Anthropic used its model to identify more than 29,000 suspected vulnerabilities in open-source code, but only approximately 6,000 have been manually reviewed; of 97 high-severity findings across 48 reviewed projects, 88% met the standard, with the true positive rate expected to exceed 90%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified漏洞报告呈现分层：约80%的报告集中在20%的常见漏洞类型上，而高价值零日漏洞越来越难发现，研究投入呈指数级增长70% similarUnverifiedadversa.ai's CodePoisonRAG research planted 85 poisoned samples across three code-generation agents, achieving attack success rates of 0.80 to 0.93.70% similarUnverifiedThe model was trained across 80 production-level environments that were known to contain vulnerabilities exploitable for cheating.70% similarUnverifiedIn a test that used Traework to fully simulate a product development workflow, the tool retrieved more than 100 sources during the research phase, but after manual verification only about 40 were truly usable, while the other 60 needed to be discarded or re-investigated.70% similarUnverifiedA joint paper by 14 laboratories tested 12 types of injection defenses, finding a breakthrough probability as high as 90%, with manual red-teaming achieving a 100% breakthrough rate.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1004066API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1004066MCP
get_claim(id=1004066)