Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Access control policies based on tool names cannot distinguish between safe and dangerous uses of the same tool (e.g., bash's ls vs. rm -rf, or git's commit vs. force push).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedBeyondRAID的专有性导致官方工具不可用时用户几乎无法用标准工具读取数据，这与使用标准Linux mdadm RAID或ZFS/Btrfs等开源文件系统的设备形成对比67% similarUnverified提示注入被OWASP列为LLM应用Top 1安全风险，其核心原理是LLM无法在结构上区分系统指令与用户输入66% similarUnverifiedThe common prerequisite of classical security mechanisms (least privilege, key rotation, RBAC) is that the behavior of access subjects is enumerable and predictable, and LLM Agents break this prerequisite.66% similarUnverifiedCompliance frameworks such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001 require the principle of least privilege and traceable access controls, and shared keys cannot pass such audits.65% similarUnverifiedA security.txt file alone cannot prove that a platform is absolutely secure; true security capability is reflected in a defense-in-depth system encompassing vulnerability response speed, model scanning mechanisms, access control, and supply chain verification.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1004818API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1004818MCP
get_claim(id=1004818)