Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the PR split-review example, GPT-6.1 Sol consumed input=77, output=266, and reasoning=149 tokens, took 5.4 seconds, did not fabricate diffs, and did not claim to have run tests.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/26/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn security alignment testing, GPT-5.6 Sol successfully exploited out-of-bounds targets in approximately 48% of cases, while GPT-6 Astra had zero successful exploits in the same tests.74% similarUnverified在Terminal Bench 2.1基准测试上，GPT-5.6 Sol的Ultra模式接近92%，超越竞品的88%表现73% similarUnverified在长周期智能体工作流测试（Engines Last Exam）中，GPT-5.6 Sol 得分 53.6，比 Faber-5 高出 13.1 分73% similarUnverifiedIn the Automation Bench test, GPT-6 Sol's extra high tier achieved first place 33% of the time, while 5.6's max effort scored 28.8.72% similarUnverifiedThe claim that Decision-1 is 35 times faster than GPT-6 Sol is self-reported data from the vendor, lacking independent third-party benchmark evidence.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1005004API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1005004MCP
get_claim(id=1005004)