Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The only pattern that held up in both time periods is: companies perform noticeably worse after issuing new shares, but there are only 98 such samples, which is too small a sample size to serve as a reliable strategy.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn an S&P 500 option chain experiment, after sparsifying the data to retain only 20 quotes and introducing no-arbitrage constraints, the out-of-sample extrapolation error on the held-out set decreased by 22% and the calendar arbitrage occurrence rate dropped from 10% to 1%.69% similarUnverifiedWhen the success rate is extremely low, almost all sample rewards are identical, resulting in extremely high policy gradient variance and very low signal-to-noise ratio, preventing the model from obtaining effective update directions.68% similarUnverifiedSetting an absolute failure count ceiling for small-sample slices is more robust than setting a percentage threshold and is insensitive to sample size66% similarUnverifiedSome research estimates that fewer than 20% of strategies selected through backtesting within quantitative funds remain consistently effective in live trading.66% similarUnverifiedFor high-stakes fields such as finance and healthcare, 80% accuracy is not good enough.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1005472API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1005472MCP
get_claim(id=1005472)