Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
History compression breaks provenance: pass the guard the original role-separated messages, rather than a summary that turns tool text into user text.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedStuffing large amounts of historical records into a prompt not only incurs token costs, but may also cause important information to be drowned out due to attention dilution, producing worse results than a curated short summary.72% similarVerifiedWhen conversation history exceeds the context window limit, platforms use engineering methods such as truncation and summary compression to trim the context, a process that inevitably loses detail information.71% similarUnverifiedTraditional context compression or sliding window schemes carry the risk of permanent information loss, whereas reversible archiving retains the complete original text and allows recovery at any time.69% similarUnverifiedRe-chunking and re-embedding an entire document wastes compute and loses the continuous identity of the content, making it impossible to answer questions about the historical versions of a clause.69% similarUnverifiedExisting provenance, attestation, and transparency mechanisms can expose historical records but cannot independently define the state transition conditions that a publication action must satisfy.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1006100API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1006100MCP
get_claim(id=1006100)