Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Nautilus's own coding tool scored 26.7% in the benchmark test, against a baseline of 16.7%, an improvement of 10.0 percentage points, which is above the pre-registered noise floor δ=2.1pp, but did not reach the "excellent" standard it set.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/26/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEarly testing on the Opus model showed an exact string recognition rate of 0 out of 15, whereas after the release of Fable 5 the same test yielded 13 out of 15.62% similarUnverifiedIn DeepSeek's official comparison, when running with the same checkpoint at best effort, its minimal framework scored 72.6 while the open-source code scored 65.5.60% similarUnverifiedIn Microsoft's internal evaluation covering 36 benchmarks and nearly 150,000 questions, Decision-1 ranked first with an average accuracy of 83.5%, surpassing Jev 1.13.0 (82.3%), Quyet-1.0-Large (81.9%), and GPT-6 Luna Decisions (79.4%).60% similarUnverified基于尾调用的字节码分发在某些基准测试中可带来 5-15% 的性能提升60% similarUnverifiedcheckwash 0.6.0 achieved a precision of 0.67 and recall of 0.22 for its own block judgment on this corpus, while the raw count signal read independently yielded a precision of 0.80 and recall of 0.89.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1006715API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1006715MCP
get_claim(id=1006715)