Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
For probabilistic systems, rules written in prompts are suggestions, not law; code, by contrast, is unambiguous and executable, either running or erroring out.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe hard constraints of formal methods encode safety rules as inviolable logical specifications, perform verification before action execution, operate independently of the model, and cannot be bypassed by attackers through manipulating model inputs.69% similarUnverifiedPermission checks must exist in code that the model cannot bypass through reasoning; alignment techniques should not serve as the control plane.67% similarUnverifiedGeneral-purpose large models lack an intrinsic understanding of constraint solver behavior, and the code they generate is often syntactically valid but geometrically over-constrained, under-constrained, or topologically erroneous.66% similarUnverifiedFor Q&A requirements that involve ambiguous rules, subjective judgment, or exploratory queries, the deterministic rules engine becomes a constraint and is not suitable for the Adjudicated Query pattern.66% similarUnverified哥德尔不完备定理的推论之一是不存在能够判定任意程序是否停机的算法（停机问题），代码正确性验证在一般意义上属于不可判定问题65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1007511API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1007511MCP
get_claim(id=1007511)