Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
This benchmark has the following limitations: judge reliability issues, the sample size limitation of each of the 100 scenarios being run only once, a single pressure condition, a pure text environment, the <think> block not guaranteeing access to the model's complete internal reasoning, and limited generalization ability.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedClassical-school tests avoid brittleness by verifying only the final state, but at the cost of making it harder to pinpoint the root cause when a test fails, because multiple real components participate in the test simultaneously.77% similarUnverifiedCalling real models on every test suite run is an anti-pattern: it is slow, unstable, consumes request quotas, and makes it difficult to distinguish between code issues and changes in model responses when tests fail.73% similarUnverifiedIn benchmark testing, execution failures and model decisions should be counted separately to avoid misinterpreting a single quota overrun as a deficiency in model capability.73% similarUnverified由于LLM的非确定性，单次测试通过无法区分80%可靠和100%可靠的系统，因此重复运行多次是Agent测试的必要方法73% similarUnverifiedA passing test under any fixed compute budget can only provide limited safety guarantees, because the discoverability of out-of-control behavior is positively correlated with compute.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1007713API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1007713MCP
get_claim(id=1007713)