Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Rillet's customer success team uses a Chrome extension to highlight issues and describe changes in the Rillet application; the eve Agent captures the context and hands it to a coding Agent to write specs, modify code, open a PR, and launch a browser in a sandbox to verify the changes and attach screenshots, with Anthony finally responsible for review and merging.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAnthony is building an internal "Agent factory" at Rillet so that larger features follow a similar pipeline: one Agent writes the PRD and technical specs, another connects to Linear, Miro and the knowledge base to provide context, leveraging eve's sub-Agent and delegation capabilities to join the same framework as a directory.62% similarUnverifiedRillet used Vercel's open-source Agent framework eve, which collects instructions, tools and skills into a unified directory structure, including agent.ts, instructions.md, tools/, skills/, subagents/, channels/, schedules/, etc.61% similarVerifiedAgent DevTools draws inspiration from Browser DevTools, allowing developers to inspect an AI Agent's internal operations similarly to how Chrome DevTools inspects page elements and network requests60% similarUnverifiedAlchemize uses a browser Agent to test affected workflows; unlike traditional Selenium/Playwright scripted UI testing, browser Agents leverage the visual understanding and reasoning capabilities of large language models to operate pages, making them more robust to layout changes.60% similarUnverifiedIf write-operation tools such as Append and Update are attached to the agent in the template, the agent will call them as well, and the risk rises accordingly.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1008397API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1008397MCP
get_claim(id=1008397)