Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The author re-rated the 112 items based on the code's actual capabilities: 29 β , 64 π‘, 19 β¬, versus the published status of 43/52/17, with 16 items rated by the author lower than the coverage status the tool publicly claims.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA developer reviewed 27 prompts accumulated over one year, of which 22 failed the reproducibility test (i.e., others using the prompts could not obtain the same output as the author).66% similarUnverifiedThree independent Subagents performed adversarial re-verification of the retrospective diary, checking 120 verifiable claims (including 26 commit hashes and more than 40 cited line numbers), resulting in zero fabrications and nine corrections (all involving line number drift and unit conversion issues).65% similarUnverifiedOf the 962 responses, 51 failed, distributed as 26 truncations, 13 boundary errors, 12 paraphrases, and 0 corrections.63% similarUnverifiedThe 44% reduction in inference tokens is a self-reported figure from the author and has not been verified by third-party reproduction; the original materials do not disclose the data construction method, training algorithm, sampling scale, or benchmark test details.61% similarUnverifiedFor a document containing 100 fields, even if the per-field accuracy is as high as 99%, the probability of the entire document being fully correct is only about 37%.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1010545API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1010545MCP
get_claim(id=1010545)