Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On Terminal Bench v2.1, Beam's 80.1 trails DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 90.6; on DeepSWE v1.1, Beam's 44.4 trails GLM-5.3's 61.0 and Kimi K3's 68.0.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/26/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDeepSeek's model V4 Flash 0731 achieved a score of 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.1.73% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash is on par with GLM 5.3 and Kimi K3 on several key benchmark tests.68% similarUnverifiedThere is no all-around winner among the three lightweight models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the highest quality but is slow, Haiku 5.5 is fast and leads in writing but lags in programming visual output, and GPT-6 Luna performed poorly on tasks.65% similarUnverifiedIn the black hole demo project, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash performed the best and received 90 points, while GLM5.3 Flash came in last.64% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash adopts a MoE (Mixture of Experts) backbone architecture with 552B parameters.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1011090API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1011090MCP
get_claim(id=1011090)