Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Ganesh believes probabilistic machines will always be probabilistic machines, and that even if the hallucination rate drops to 0.0001%, the approach of 'eliminating hallucinations with more tokens' has a fundamental problem.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedLLM outputs are probabilistic, carry hallucination risks, and may misjudge context and invoke tools that should not be invoked.64% similarUnverifiedLLM-based multi-agent systems face challenges including model output randomness, context window limitations, hallucination propagation amplification, and coordination overhead.62% similarUnverifiedWhen one component of a system already has randomness, stacking a probabilistic component on top of it exponentially amplifies debugging difficulty.61% similarUnverified能用确定性工具解决的解析任务不应交给概率性的LLM，因为确定性工具速度快、结果确定、零幻觉61% similarUnverifiedMulti-agent systems significantly amplify the uncertainty of LLMs; one agent's hallucination can contaminate the entire pipeline, making observability and error isolation design particularly critical61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1011246API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1011246MCP
get_claim(id=1011246)