Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The authors strongly recommend using a judge of equal or greater capability for original evaluations, because simpler or weaker judges let in a large number of misjudgments.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen a review combines a low score with high confidence and the criticism is unjustified, it amplifies the gap between the review opinion and the actual evidence, making it easier for the AC to identify it as a review quality issue.75% similarUnverified实践中按维度拆分的专用评审器（事实性、风格、安全、幻觉）比通用评审器更有价值。74% similarUnverifiedHigh-confidence negative reviews are harder to overturn through rebuttal because the reviewer believes they fully understand the paper.73% similarUnverifiedCritics point out that reusing review comments may lead to the problem of "one bad review, repeated suffering across multiple venues."72% similarUnverifiedThe study proposes a Mixture-of-Judges framework, whose core idea is to fuse multiple evaluation signals rather than relying on a single evaluation source.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1012079API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1012079MCP
get_claim(id=1012079)