Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Blocking monitoring and continual learning are in tension, and by default the tension will tend toward monitor failure; the usefulness cost of a control protocol under continual learning not only leads to paying a price but also leads to safety degradation.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified网关自带的重试和降级机制在计费维度上可能导致成本非线性失控，成本的可预测性往往比成本的绝对高低更重要75% similarVerifiedDrift detection involves a trade-off: setting the threshold too sensitively leads to frequent false alarms and unnecessary retraining, while setting it too loosely may allow model performance to continuously degrade without being detected.74% similarUnverifiedOnline learning mechanisms carry an inherent risk: if feedback signals are noisy or systematically biased, the optimization process may produce negative drift, causing the system to degrade over time.73% similarUnverifiedA blocking monitor scores each action for suspiciousness during AI deployment, intercepting actions that exceed a threshold and replacing them with the output of a weaker trusted model; this mechanism faces a structural threat from continual learning.73% similarUnverifiedUnconstrained recursive self-improvement can lead to performance drift, runaway costs, and even contamination of training data through leakage.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1012109API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1012109MCP
get_claim(id=1012109)