Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The paper's core evaluation metric is the agreement between LLMs and human annotators.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLLM-as-Judge范式已被多项研究证实与人类评估具有较高相关性77% similarUnverifiedThe epistemic calibration test examines whether a model can accurately perceive the boundaries of its own knowledge, whereas traditional LLM benchmarks such as MMLU and HumanEval typically use accuracy as the sole metric.65% similarUnverifiedLLM-as-a-Judge 常见评估模式包括单点评分、成对比较以及参考答案对照评分64% similarUnverifiedThe model input features cover demographic variables, clinical condition information, hospital center identifier, baseline BDI-II scores, and treatment engagement indicators.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1012337API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1012337MCP
get_claim(id=1012337)