Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
An independent audit found: denials were written to alerts.jsonl while the gate's notification command was empty, so no one was told when a denial occurred; the denials.jsonl specified in the config file was 0 bytes, so an operator reading that file would wrongly conclude there were no denials; and no record carried the limit value, making it impossible to see how far over the line it was.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/10/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn SentryFlow, denial takes priority over approval, and approval cannot override denial.67% similarUnverifiedWhen validating a JWT, it is not sufficient to only verify the signature; standard claims such as exp, nbf, iss, and aud must also be strictly validated, and tokens that are expired or have mismatched audiences must be rejected.65% similarUnverifiedThe lack of a clear escalation mechanism creates implicit authorization—no one explicitly approves and no one explicitly rejects—causing risk to go live in a state of no accountability.65% similarUnverifiedThe ledger adopts a fail-closed (default deny) core principle: execution is refused unless the patch is proven to stay within the whitelist.62% similarUnverifiedFailure paths for gate rejection include: empty diff rejection, rejection for changes to test files only with no production code changes, rejection for production symbol changes without property tests, and rejection for properties passing on an unsealed summary.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1012576API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1012576MCP
get_claim(id=1012576)