Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the double integrator example and the Safety Gym environments, FAITH achieves the highest return among methods with no feasible-start violations, while matching the lowest harm level under infeasible starts.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/11/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedExplicitly marking risk boundaries at the execution engine layer is more reliable than repeatedly emphasizing caution in prompts, and can reduce the probability of security failures caused by prompt drift66% similarUnverifiedThere is a trade-off between high-risk, high-value scenarios and low-risk, quick-win scenarios, and the first use case should sacrifice potential value in exchange for a lower cost of trial and error.64% similarUnverifiedIn high-risk scenarios, automatic execution is only permitted when the matching confidence exceeds a very high threshold (such as 99.5%); otherwise it is downgraded to manual review.64% similarUnverifiedThe first version of the task set was 100% trick questions, with a single-attempt baseline of 0/12, making it impossible to measure the harm of ungated correction; the harm only became measurable after adding clean tasks.63% similarUnverified回形针最大化器是博斯特罗姆的思想实验，揭示危险不一定来自恶意目标，一个错误指定的目标加上足够强大的优化能力后果可能同样灾难性63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1013205API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1013205MCP
get_claim(id=1013205)