Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
FAITH's accuracy is limited by offline data coverage and generalization ability, and the distribution of the safety value approximation error in high dimensions is not clear.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedErrors in confidence scoring systems are distributed across the entire score range, manifesting as calibration error—high in coverage but difficult to detect.66% similarUnverifiedThe threshold of "marginal risk being equivalent to other risks" is extremely difficult to quantify, as there is currently neither a widely accepted metric nor a sufficiently neutral institution to adjudicate it.66% similarUnverifiedNaïve confidence-stratified comparisons are unreliable because uncontrolled detection strength can confound conclusions.66% similarUnverifiedPoint-estimate confidence fails under distribution shift, whereas Bayesian uncertainty measures such as MC Dropout can genuinely identify signal failure.65% similarUnverifiedResearch reveals that LLMs do not reliably weight and update based on evidence reliability like an ideal Bayesian agent, but instead exhibit behavioral patterns close to distributional skew, with their influence being less correlated with the true reliability of evidence than the Bayesian framework would predict.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1013211API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1013211MCP
get_claim(id=1013211)