Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In HivePlane v0.2.0, defect #530 caused the drift detector to compare failure counts across corpus versions, so that a scale-up benchmark automatically quarantined a healthy agent.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/11/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA more covert failure pattern is when an agent, rather than fixing the underlying code, continuously adds or modifies tests until the entire test suite turns green.62% similarUnverifiedWhen sub-agent output quality degrades and the orchestrator lacks effective anomaly detection logic, the system falls into a repeated review-failure loop and consumes API quota.61% similarUnverifiedThe v6 dataset was rebuilt around v1's failure modes, including refusal rows, anti-hallucination pairs, calibration examples, and tool trajectories; v2 achieved 9/10 domain tasks, 5/5 honesty, 5/5 refusal capability, and 0/10 hallucination rate on the same evaluation harness, with data composition as the only variable.60% similarUnverifiedAnomaly detection faces engineering challenges such as false positive rates, baseline drift, and cold start problems, and is not a silver bullet.60% similarUnverifiedVague task descriptions, lack of clear acceptance criteria, undefined scope of modifications, and failure to decompose sub-steps can cause agents to fall into repeated exploratory loops.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1013841API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1013841MCP
get_claim(id=1013841)