Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In automated pipelines, when the same session is reused to handle different types of requests, format conventions, terminology assumptions, and even role tone left over from the previous task create 'contamination' that causes the new task's output to deviate from expectations.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedMid-conversation interjection faces the coordination problem between streaming generation and the message queue: newly arriving user input must either be cached for the next round of requests or injected into the current context via an interrupt/append mechanism.71% similarUnverifiedA new model's text response may appear normal, but underneath it may have missed a tool call, passed in different parameters, or selected a different tool to perform the task.70% similarUnverifiedChanging the model or effort level mid-conversation completely invalidates the prompt cache, causing the next message to re-read all content.70% similarUnverified当模型输出工具调用语法后会停止响应，Harness执行工具并将输出追加到对话历史末尾，然后向同一模型重新发起请求69% similarUnverified并行任务将多个功能分支依次合并时可能出现代码冲突，因为不同任务可能修改到同一处代码69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1014089API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1014089MCP
get_claim(id=1014089)