Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the author's published 25-question small-sample evaluation, ZY-S1 dropped from 4 to 0 on MATH-500 compared with the base model, showing degradation in mathematical ability.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/27/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the author's published 25-question small-sample evaluation, ZY-S1 improved over the base model on ARC-Challenge from 76 to 80 (+4 percentage points) and on MMLU from 48 to 52 (+4 percentage points).75% similarVerifiedIn 2022, Hoffmann et al.'s Chinchilla paper redid experiments on four hundred models and concluded that, under the premise of compute-optimality, each parameter should correspond to approximately 20 tokens.66% similarUnverifiedZillow 的 Zestimate 自动估值模型误差率中位数在2-7%之间65% similarUnverifiedZ-score standardization transforms data into a distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.64% similarUnverifiedEach model answered 112 questions (7 flaw types × 2 versions × 4 repetitions × 2 conditions), with half flawed and half sound, and a model that mechanically answered 'none' would receive a baseline score of 0.50.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1014224API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1014224MCP
get_claim(id=1014224)