Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Across a range of question sizes spanning 256x, the error judgment rate of a single run is almost unchanged: 0.531 at T=16 and 0.534 at T=4096.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedClaude Opus 4.6 produced 30 times more errors than GPT-5.4, averaging 2.5 errors per trajectory vs. 0.08, with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.0001, Cliff's δ = 0.613).71% similarUnverifiedMistral Small 4 scored only 0.699 on unit conversion inputs and produced 265 errors that differed from the correct label by exactly a power of ten.71% similarUnverifiedPerplexity Decider V1.1 27B topped the evaluation with a score of 80/82, a median latency of 0.445 seconds, and zero flips across 26 reversal tests.71% similarUnverifiedOn an internal benchmark of 2,843 multilingual customer service tickets, THX-01 achieved 98.4% accuracy, an ECE of 0.003, and a measured latency of approximately 10ms, outperforming TypeSafe Jev 1.13 (97.4% accuracy, ECE 0.007, latency 331ms).70% similarUnverifiedThe C runtime's perplexity is 26.8407, and the PyTorch reference implementation's is 26.8188, a difference of 0.082%, meeting the threshold of <=1%.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1014439API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1014439MCP
get_claim(id=1014439)