Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Qwen2.5-1.5B scores 0.729 on GSM8K, 18.2 percentage points lower than Gemma 4 E2B; Qwen3-0.6B scores 0.599, 31.2 percentage points lower; SmolLM2-1.7B scores 0.461, 45.0 percentage points lower.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
单块TPU v5e实测：哪些小模型能与Gemma 4 E2B一战？
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the GSM8K mathematical reasoning test, Qwen3-4B scores 0.915 and Gemma 4 E2B scores 0.911, a difference of +0.4 percentage points with a confidence interval crossing zero, making it the only model on par with Gemma.79% similarUnverifiedOn the BFCL tool-calling test, SmolLM3-3B scores 0.945, slightly above Gemma 4 E2B's 0.927, but the difference is not significant; Qwen3-4B (0.940), Qwen3-1.7B (0.935), Qwen2.5-1.5B (0.910), and Granite 3.3 2B (0.920) are all at the same level as Gemma.78% similarUnverifiedGlimmer's intelligence index score of 35 surpasses Gemma 2 27B (30) and nearly matches Qwen 2.5 (36), with Qwen 2.5 72B topping the leaderboard at 38.74% similarUnverifiedThe original Qwen3.5-0.8B has NLL of 2.905585 and PPL of 18.2759; Qwengram-0.8B has NLL of 2.853786 and PPL of 17.3534.72% similarUnverifiedQwen3-1.7B's overall causal faithfulness is only 54.8%, far below that of Qwen3-4B.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1014588API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1014588MCP
get_claim(id=1014588)