Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
To determine whether a PR is currently requested to be changed, you must group each review record by reviewer, take each person's latest stateful review, and then combine it with the time of the last commit to judge whether that verdict has been offset by a subsequent commit; directly doing Enum.any?(state == "CHANGES_REQUESTED") on the list is equivalent to asking whether anyone has ever historically requested changes, and once true it is forever true.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOne fix is to first reduce the review list to each reviewer's current verdict: group by reviewer, take each reviewer's latest stateful review, where COMMENTED and PENDING carry no verdict and never override a previous verdict.63% similarVerifiedACL ARR review results can be reused within a certain cycle; authors may choose to commit to a conference or Findings, or withdraw and re-enter with existing reviews in a subsequent cycle.60% similarUnverifiedA more granular and more recently updated specific policy (the author change policy) should generally take precedence over a general call for papers.59% similarUnverifiedThe core idea of rolling review is to shift paper review from an annual concentrated model to year-round continuous acceptance and processing, allowing authors to submit at any time.59% similarUnverifiedSubmitters who do need to make changes should save comparison evidence of the before-and-after versions in preparation for communication.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1016476API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1016476MCP
get_claim(id=1016476)