Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Another fix is to apply to reviews the same staleness guard as the comment path, requiring the verdict to be newer than the last commit and not already processed, with two independent conditions making the review be treated as processed.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedOnce a schematic has been reviewed and confirmed, it should be saved and used as the basis for further work, as regenerating with the same prompt will produce a new draft that requires re-review.75% similarUnverifiedWhen submitting a Chrome extension, unchecking the "Publish automatically after review" option decouples review from publication, causing the extension to enter a "Approved, pending publication" state awaiting manual release after passing review.65% similarUnverifiedSafe recovery of persistent agents requires distinguishing replayable operations (such as reading files and analyzing code) from non-replayable side-effect operations (such as writing files and committing changes), the latter requiring precise progress tracking to avoid repeated execution.65% similarUnverifiedIn the system, CHANGES_REQUESTED is checked before APPROVED, causing the loop to keep firing even after the reviewer later approves the PR, and the approval branch is never reached.65% similarUnverifiedManual requests can initiate changes, but the original evaluation and release strategy still determines whether the proposed edits ultimately take effect.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1016482API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1016482MCP
get_claim(id=1016482)