Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The solution the article's author proposes is to change the structure of the question, explicitly requiring the assistant to answer only based on the given material, to cite the original sentence for each factual statement, and to write 'Not in the document' and point out the missing input when the material does not answer it.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe classic rebuttal structure recommends opening with two or three sentences summarizing the paper's core contributions, addressing each reviewer by number in the main body, and dedicating a separate paragraph to concerns shared by multiple reviewers.71% similarUnverified在修改论文时应把研究解决的真实问题、现有方法的不足及方案的本质区别写进摘要和引言的前两段68% similarUnverifiedDocumentation authors acting as observers need to resist the urge to add supplementary explanations, because every time they speak up to help, they conceal a real documentation deficiency.68% similarUnverifiedDuring each commitment window, authors can submit their paper together with the review record, author response, and revision notes to the program committee of the target conference.68% similarUnverifiedThe author lists practices that did not work for them: massive monolithic context files, feeding complete session logs to the next session, letting the agent decide task scope on its own, and trusting co-generated tests.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1018513API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1018513MCP
get_claim(id=1018513)