Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the same HDFS anomaly detection task, gpt-4.1-nano achieved 79% accuracy, and gpt-6.1-sol (only 100 samples) achieved 66% accuracy.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/11/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the hard-to-verify category with no bait, GPT-5.4 nano answered only 19/40 questions correctly in both orderings and had a 65% probability of selecting Response A; GPT-5.4 mini had a 66% probability of selecting A, Grok 4.20 non-reasoning was 62%, while strong judges were stable at 50%.71% similarUnverifiedGPT-6 Astra achieved 100% accuracy on the eight-needle benchmark in the 256K–512K token range.69% similarUnverifiedThe best-performing Edu-QuRater achieved an average accuracy of 0.917 in reproducing GPT-4.1-mini pairwise judgments on the held-out set.67% similarUnverifiedIn EvoArena testing, GPT-5.5, which achieved the highest Step Level score, had an accuracy of just over 50%, while Gemini-3.1 Pro and GLM-5.1, which performed best at the Chain Level, reached only approximately 28%–29%.65% similarUnverifiedGemma 4 31B, Gemma 4 26B-A4B, Gemini 3.7 Flash, GPT-6-sol, and GLM-5 achieved 100% fidelity in this benchmark.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1018527API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1018527MCP
get_claim(id=1018527)