Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
Tools like Deslop typically need to trade off between rule strictness and false positive rate: the more aggressive the rules, the more redundancy they can clean up, but the more likely they are to flag safety code humans deliberately wrote as a problem.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified基于规则的命令拦截工具面临误报与漏报平衡的难题，因为命令危险性依赖上下文72% similarUnverifiedUsing code hooks for hard interception is more reliable than placing safety rules in prompts and relying on the model to self-enforce them, because the model can be bypassed or produce hallucinations.68% similarUnverifiedPoorly designed system prompts (such as those that overemphasize completing user tasks at all costs) may undermine the model's safety guardrails; the agent framework design, permission controls, and the security of the operated system collectively determine whether such incidents occur.67% similarUnverifiedEvery security tool faces a trade-off between security and usability, as overly strict interception rules may block normal development workflows66% similarUnverified规则层不应堆砌过多规则，规则越多维护成本越高且容易造成误判66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1021017API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1021017MCP
get_claim(id=1021017)