Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Monveil adopts a minimal trust boundary design: the model can only read structured verification results, its output can only be natural language explanations, it cannot write back state, cannot trigger signatures, and cannot change determinations; even if the model is fully compromised, the worst outcome is merely a poor explanation, not funds being transferred away.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedContradictory prompt rules cause the model to fail to perform actions it should have taken, for example, four legitimate refunds that should have been processed were not issued.68% similarUnverifiedThe weakest aspect of current coding agents is process trust: developers typically do not understand why a model generates specific code, and therefore cannot form stable trust calibration.68% similarUnverifiedThe paper points out that fidelity can only quantify whether an explanation can reproduce model outputs, but cannot guarantee that the explanation correctly reflects the underlying decision-making process.67% similarUnverifiedLarge models lack a natural mechanism for distinguishing 'instruction source trustworthiness' when processing context, making it difficult to automatically identify which text constitutes authorized executable instructions and which is merely data content to be processed.67% similarUnverifiedReasoning mode can defend against injection only when the model genuinely spends extra tokens redoing the calculation; simply enabling reasoning mode does not guarantee injection protection.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1021509API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1021509MCP
get_claim(id=1021509)