Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Under the naive read-modify-write pattern, multiple asynchronous processes reading and writing the same account simultaneously can lead to double-spend vulnerabilities; a pure double-entry ledger does not store a mutable balance column, so the attack vector shifts to summing the entries, but under high concurrency inserting conflicting transactions can still introduce races.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEach row-by-row INSERT triggers overhead such as transaction log writes, index maintenance, and constraint checks, and under concurrent pressure also generates lock contention.69% similarUnverified多Agent共享记忆面临写入冲突的语义消解挑战，传统数据库锁机制无法判断哪个Agent的更新在业务语义上更正确69% similarUnverifiedUnder the token-based billing model, users find it difficult to independently verify the tokens consumed per call and the platform's conversion rate, creating an information-asymmetric space for fraud.68% similarUnverifiedThe inability to reproduce an issue consistently (the same code and input sometimes working and sometimes not) strongly points to external state such as cache, database, or concurrency being the culprit.67% similarUnverified若某个进程长期持有数据库连接且不释放读锁，checkpoint会被阻塞导致WAL文件无限膨胀67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1021617API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1021617MCP
get_claim(id=1021617)