Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
California Penal Code Section 632 prohibits anyone from eavesdropping on or recording 'confidential communications' via electronic devices without the consent of all parties.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedArticle 27 of the Cybersecurity Law explicitly prohibits unauthorized network intrusion and interference.70% similarUnverifiedThe injunction demands a mandatory ban on granting agents with autonomous action permissions unrestricted external internet access, unless verified through a third-party authoritative isolation sandbox68% similarUnverifiedThe CFAA strictly prohibits unauthorized access to others' computer systems and is currently the primary legal barrier preventing private companies from retaliating on their own.67% similarUnverifiedThe primary legal basis currently in California related to covert recording is Section 647(j) of the California Penal Code (the Peeping Tom law).66% similarUnverifiedIn the privacy lawsuit against Otter.AI, the federal court allowed claims under the federal wiretap law and California CIPA Section 631 to proceed, with the plaintiffs arguing that Otter's terms of service cannot satisfy all-party consent state requirements; this is a ruling on a motion to dismiss, not a finding of liability.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1022079API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1022079MCP
get_claim(id=1022079)