Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
In safety alignment, if features are selected by probe scores, since the direction agreement rate is only 17%–35%, features whose post-intervention effect is opposite or ineffective are likely to be selected, causing safety measures to fail or even backfire.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn high-risk scenarios, automatic execution is only permitted when the matching confidence exceeds a very high threshold (such as 99.5%); otherwise it is downgraded to manual review.75% similarUnverifiedNewly launched features often lack sufficient adversarial testing, and security reviews may only cover the main flow, leaving edge cases, abnormal inputs, and permission intersection zones easily blank, so the duplicate rate is lower and the probability of being first is higher.73% similarUnverifiedAblation testing diagnoses whether a feature is effective by setting its weight to zero one at a time and observing performance changes: if performance is nearly unchanged after disabling it, the feature design is problematic or redundant; a significant drop proves it is contributing.73% similarUnverifiedNaïve confidence-stratified comparisons are unreliable because uncontrolled detection strength can confound conclusions.73% similarUnverifiedWhen prior knowledge about possible fault patterns is available, selecting a sparse penalty structure that matches them often yields significant performance gains over general-purpose algorithms73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1023420API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1023420MCP
get_claim(id=1023420)