Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
One third of the samples in the benchmark are semantics-preserving rewrites of formal artifacts, with the label still being faithful, to prevent the judge from simply scoring by 'was edited'.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedPresenting the two interpretations of a "suspected rename" side by side can still be deterministic: as long as the same two specifications are given, the order and content of the output candidate list remain stable and unchanged.70% similarUnverifiedThe author recommends not repeating descriptions of features already encoded in the .char file in generation prompts, as doing so will mislead the generation results.70% similarUnverifiedForm field labels must all be lowercase, because the scoring node looks up fields by exact label name, and uppercase letters will cause mismatches that result in valid leads being incorrectly flagged as invalid.69% similarUnverifiedAfter response rewriting, the source-dependence effect still persists and may even introduce additional shifts brought by the rewriter itself, indicating that Imprinting is not driven merely by surface wording.69% similarUnverified受限解码在保证格式正确性的同时，可能改变模型实际采样分布，导致语义质量的次优选择69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1023858API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1023858MCP
get_claim(id=1023858)