Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The creator tested Local Receipt Sorter on 25 documents, including 15 PDFs, 10 photos, and 15 screenshots, and the author acknowledged that this sample size can only demonstrate feasibility, not reliability.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/12/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA developer reviewed 27 prompts accumulated over one year, of which 22 failed the reproducibility test (i.e., others using the prompts could not obtain the same output as the author).66% similarUnverifiedOne version of skipping low-probability chunks skipped 17 chunks that were subsequently proven to contain relevant evidence.66% similarUnverifiedIn manually proofread samples, the character error rate was only 0.68% when the text was clearly legible, but approximately 45% of sampled passages were completely uncorrectable due to source quality issues.66% similarUnverifiedThe author used five real financial/payment documents and ten manually verified test questions to conduct a side-by-side comparison of four approaches: vector-only, BM25-only, hybrid retrieval without reranking, and the full ReRankEval pipeline.63% similarUnverifiedThe 44% reduction in inference tokens is a self-reported figure from the author and has not been verified by third-party reproduction; the original materials do not disclose the data construction method, training algorithm, sampling scale, or benchmark test details.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1024292API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1024292MCP
get_claim(id=1024292)