Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Without having seen Terminal-Bench training data, Tev-27B surpassed GLM 5.2 and Gemini 3.7 Flash on the TB 3.0 and 4.0 subsets, and reached the performance of Claude Opus 4.8 on TB 2.1.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/28/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM-5.3-Flash 在 Terminal-Bench 2.1 得84.3分，略低于 Claude Opus 4.8 的85.0分和 GPT-5.6 Terra 的87.4分。65% similarUnverifiedOn UC-Bench, Qwen3.5-4B trained on UC-Data outperformed larger general-purpose models such as Claude Opus 4.8.65% similarVerifiedOn mainstream benchmarks such as MMLU and HumanEval, the score gaps among Claude 3.5, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Grok-2 have been compressed to within the range of statistical error.62% similarUnverifiedDataBugBench testing covers five models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B, and Llama 3.3 70B.62% similarUnverifiedGLM-5.3-Flash 在 AutomationBench 上得48.8分，领先 Claude Opus 4.8 的41.0分和 GPT-5.6 Terra 的37.2分，单任务成本约0.045美元。61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1024909API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1024909MCP
get_claim(id=1024909)