Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On 12 synthetic incident report extraction tasks, using Ollama to run llama3.1:8b locally with temperature=0 and a fixed seed, the single-call condition field accuracy was 30/36 (83.3%), and the three-step pipeline (planner, executor, reviewer) condition was 33/36 (91.7%).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAccording to Partha Sarkar, when a CrewAI three-agent support team in hierarchical mode received a purely technical query, the manager invoked all three agents including the billing agent, the billing response covered up the correct technical answer, the run consumed 38 seconds and 15,759 tokens, produced about 200 tokens of output, and reported no errors; the root cause is that hierarchical mode does not enforce conditional branching or true delegation.63% similarUnverifiedThe archived score for the Faria detector task is a balanced accuracy of 29/30—that is, 29/30 injections detected and 0/30 false positives—and back-calculating through the scoring formula also yields 29 correct clean instances.62% similarUnverifiedIn a model comparison test, qwen2.5:3b correctly understood pace, produced 0 hallucinated place names, had a length error of 0.3%, peak memory of 259 MB, and took 106 seconds.62% similarUnverifiedUnder conditions where the target language is explicitly specified in the prompt (L3 prompts), GLM-5.1 achieved a generation accuracy of 72.29%, while Llama-3.3 70B reached only 24.24%.61% similarUnverified实测参数建议：测试阶段用480P分辨率+8步速度最快但有明显瑕疵；生产阶段建议768标准或480P、步数不低于24、性价比约30步、正式产出建议50步61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1025941API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1025941MCP
get_claim(id=1025941)