Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The executor, independently of the 60-character prompt, reached 88.9% (32/36) field accuracy simply by reading the full original report; the reviewer added 1 further correct field on top of that, bringing the pipeline as a whole to 33/36.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified一张包含30个字段、单字段准确率98%的发票，完全正确的概率约为54.5%70% similarUnverifiedIn tests covering context lengths of 512–4096, increasing the draft length from 4 tokens to 16 tokens resulted in only a 0.2%–1.3% increase in overall inference latency.69% similarUnverifiedIn Microsoft's internal evaluation covering 36 benchmarks and nearly 150,000 questions, Decision-1 ranked first with an average accuracy of 83.5%, surpassing Jev 1.13.0 (82.3%), Quyet-1.0-Large (81.9%), and GPT-6 Luna Decisions (79.4%).65% similarUnverifiedcheckwash 0.6.0 achieved a precision of 0.67 and recall of 0.22 for its own block judgment on this corpus, while the raw count signal read independently yielded a precision of 0.80 and recall of 0.89.65% similarUnverifiedThe text-only memory method achieved a four-label exact-match accuracy of only 16%–17%.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1025951API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1025951MCP
get_claim(id=1025951)