Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Among the five evaluators the authors tested, if the answer key had minor errors, the score was only 0.21 — lower than giving no key at all (0.46) and lower than giving a completely irrelevant key (0.50); while a human-verified model-generated answer scored 0.61, close to the 0.69 of a human-written one.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn manually proofread samples, the character error rate was only 0.68% when the text was clearly legible, but approximately 45% of sampled passages were completely uncorrectable due to source quality issues.73% similarUnverified评分器要求每个金额与标准答案的误差在£0.005以内，前提标志正确，且桥接表在适用处必须对账成功，哪怕错1便士也判定为失败72% similarUnverifiedIn university-level proof grading, even with the experts' grading rubric in hand, 5 of 7 evaluators still passed 38.0% to 45.7% of proofs that experts judged as failures, while falsely failing only 5.0% to 12.3% of correct proofs.72% similarUnverifiedFor an invoice classification model with 97% accuracy, when a reviewer examines 300 invoices per day, only about 9 will be wrong, and errors are buried among correct items, causing the reviewer's rejection rate to approach zero.72% similarUnverifiedThe study found that the faithfulness score for counterfactual inputs was only 0.05 points lower than for factual inputs (on a 1–5 scale), a difference that is almost negligible.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1026028API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1026028MCP
get_claim(id=1026028)