Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
If the firmware is tampered with, an attacker can replace the recipient address or amount before signing, and the secure element will still sign the wrong data.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf signature verification is bypassed, the private key is leaked, or the update server and download channel are hijacked, an attacker can push arbitrary code to users' machines.80% similarUnverifiedUnder a secure boot mechanism, even if an attacker modifies the firmware code, as long as the private key is not leaked, the modified firmware cannot pass signature verification.73% similarUnverifiedIn adversarial tests, regardless of whether an attacker modifies log content, re-signs with an intruder's key, or deletes a step, AgentLog-MCP's cryptographic verification is able to detect the anomaly.72% similarUnverifiedIn an XML Signature Wrapping (XSW) attack, the attacker inserts a forged assertion into the document while preserving the original legitimate signature node, causing the verification logic to check the signed portion while the application logic uses the forged portion.70% similarUnverifiedCryptographic signing mechanisms can serve as a trust substitute for EMA because forging a valid signature is computationally infeasible, requiring an attacker to control the enterprise IdP itself.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1026186API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1026186MCP
get_claim(id=1026186)