Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the whatmodel.sh data, 14,436 results come from independent evaluations (ACL Anthology, arXiv, Epoch AI, LMArena, EvalPlus, EleutherAI harness, etc.) and 7,677 from lab self-reports, with independent evaluations accounting for about 77%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn EvoMap's benchmark test, on 563 questions using the same AI model, a single agent working independently achieved a 26% accuracy rate, while swarm collaboration mode achieved 71%.62% similarUnverifiedThe accuracy of the seven models tested on PhysMent ranges from 25% to 67%62% similarUnverifiedThe study's evaluation covers 11 agent decision points, with data drawn from 18 public sources, comprising a total of 7,283 base cases plus 6,640 robustness variants.61% similarUnverifiedThe author tested flagship models from OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic using the same 20 scenarios, and the rate at which GPT, Grok, Gemini, and two Claude models held their position when faced with nurse's notes dropped from near-perfect scores to the 70%–85% range.60% similarUnverifiedA study published on arXiv (arXiv:2610.08810) systematically evaluated the out-of-distribution performance of the Prithvi-EO-2.0 model across 37 events in 12 countries on three continents.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1026877API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1026877MCP
get_claim(id=1026877)