Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The authors published a study of 181 real code changes, in which the statement that "all tests in 10% of agent PRs fail on the old code" is incorrect.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/28/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn manually proofread samples, the character error rate was only 0.68% when the text was clearly legible, but approximately 45% of sampled passages were completely uncorrectable due to source quality issues.69% similarUnverifiedA developer reviewed 27 prompts accumulated over one year, of which 22 failed the reproducibility test (i.e., others using the prompts could not obtain the same output as the author).68% similarUnverifiedCode replay inherits errors from the extraction stage; in the cluster sufficiency test, gpt-oss-120b's pass rate actually dropped from 56% to 40%.67% similarUnverifiedAmong the panel of ten LLM reviewers used as the primary reviewer pool in the study, the average pairwise correlation coefficient of reviewer errors was 0.21.67% similarVerifiedGoogle's engineering practice research indicates that code review can detect approximately 60% of defects, far exceeding the approximately 30% detection rate of unit testing.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1028486API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1028486MCP
get_claim(id=1028486)