Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
In the SPI master controller test, the AI correctly implemented SPI mode 0 timing (CPOL=0, CPHA=0), but incorrectly used blocking assignments (=) instead of non-blocking assignments (<=) in the timing block, an error that could cause synthesis tools to reject it.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSPI在不同的时钟极性（CPOL）和时钟相位（CPHA）配置下有四种工作模式63% similarUnverifiedAI-driven self-healing is essentially still an LLM call, except that the trigger condition changes from routine execution to exception handling, significantly reducing its frequency.56% similarUnverifiedAgents run on timeout mechanisms; a tool that takes 9 seconds may be abandoned midway, and a tool that returns a 500 error causes the model to avoid that tool.56% similarUnverifiedThe number of recurrent iterations can be determined by a fixed value, or by introducing an adaptive stopping mechanism similar to Adaptive Computation Time that allows the model to decide when to stop.55% similarUnverified异步HITL模式面临幂等性保证挑战，系统需通过唯一任务ID和状态机校验防止重复执行55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1029220API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1029220MCP
get_claim(id=1029220)