Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The verdict is written back to the conversation as a four-tuple, which contains the conclusion, the dimension, the evidence location, and the failure type.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe results show that deliberation consistently reduced collective error across all four domains, with an effect exceeding passive aggregation of independent answers.67% similarUnverifiedWhen designing asynchronous sub-agents, four types of concurrency issues need to be considered: result aggregation order, error propagation strategy, state consistency, and resources and rate limiting.62% similarUnverifiedThe recommended reset strategy is to proactively start a new conversation session to clear the context and re-describe the problem in more precise natural language when errors have not converged after more than 3 rounds.62% similarUnverifiedPerformance claims lacking the four index dimensions may no longer hold on the next run; an evaluation conclusion has a clear expiration date and applicable boundary.61% similarUnverifiedThe study employs a triple-judgment mechanism: fail_fast, endstate, and diligence, with each multi-turn test broken down into three mutually exclusive dimensions.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1029251API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1029251MCP
get_claim(id=1029251)